On Multiculturalism… [Interesting take on multiculturalism in Canada]
A Fascinating post on "filling the void"
+++
Some reflections on the Path to Life. "You have made known to me the path of life; you fill me with joy in your presence" (Psalm 16:11)
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Friday, February 23, 2007
Reel Life
Pursuit of Happyness: Quite enjoyed it. Though I do wonder if enjoy is the right word. It was quite a moving film. It was inspiring seeing the way Chris dealt with the cards he was given. The most moving scene for me was when Chris and his son end up sleeping in a locked toilet cubicle at a subway station and the camera focuses on a tear which runs down his face. I was left thinking it should not come to this.
As mentioned in the movie; perhaps there’s a little something in the fact that the US founding fathers wrote the ‘pursuit’ of happiness, rather than happiness (Aside: my mind recalls the poem (by Lewis Caroll) and musical of The Hunting of the Snark, also being about the quest for happiness.
Pan’s Labyrinth – I quite liked it. Well worth a look, a little violent, but at the same time it is a rich, and beautifully crafted story.
++
On my list to see at present: The Queen, Music and Lyrics, The Last King of Scotland, Stranger than Fiction and Miss Potter.
Spinning Round
Added to my music player recently: Leigh Nash (she was lead singer of the band Sixpence None the Richer) Blue on Blue and Emmylou Harris Wrecking Ball (an older gem, that features songs written by Daniel Lanois, Neil Young and Bob Dylan).
I’m looking forward to new CDs from The Arcade Fire, Wilco, and maybe Interpol.
Quite enjoyed Don’t Dream Its Over at the Zoo last weekend. It was a tribute to the music from the Finn’s; they played classics from both Split Enz and Crowded House). It was quite enjoyable; with a great location, and atmosphere.
As mentioned in the movie; perhaps there’s a little something in the fact that the US founding fathers wrote the ‘pursuit’ of happiness, rather than happiness (Aside: my mind recalls the poem (by Lewis Caroll) and musical of The Hunting of the Snark, also being about the quest for happiness.
Pan’s Labyrinth – I quite liked it. Well worth a look, a little violent, but at the same time it is a rich, and beautifully crafted story.
++
On my list to see at present: The Queen, Music and Lyrics, The Last King of Scotland, Stranger than Fiction and Miss Potter.
Spinning Round
Added to my music player recently: Leigh Nash (she was lead singer of the band Sixpence None the Richer) Blue on Blue and Emmylou Harris Wrecking Ball (an older gem, that features songs written by Daniel Lanois, Neil Young and Bob Dylan).
I’m looking forward to new CDs from The Arcade Fire, Wilco, and maybe Interpol.
Quite enjoyed Don’t Dream Its Over at the Zoo last weekend. It was a tribute to the music from the Finn’s; they played classics from both Split Enz and Crowded House). It was quite enjoyable; with a great location, and atmosphere.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Links …
Did he really say …
“Gossip is not a trivial pastime”
Sounds like …
Random acts of kindness; and senseless acts of beauty..
+++
The Chappell-Hadlee Trophy; no its not the World Cup, but wow. NZ win by 10 wickets, 5 wickets (chasing 336), and 1 wicket (chasing 346).
“Gossip is not a trivial pastime”
Sounds like …
Random acts of kindness; and senseless acts of beauty..
+++
The Chappell-Hadlee Trophy; no its not the World Cup, but wow. NZ win by 10 wickets, 5 wickets (chasing 336), and 1 wicket (chasing 346).
Monday, February 12, 2007
Chasing Leather: With apologies to Bill Shankly: losing isn’t everything, it’s the only thing (Simon Barnes, from The Times, UK)
While I was unpacking the remaining few boxes I discovered an interesting article, which given the weekend's results (and New Zealand's sad demise) is perhaps timely...
"You can lose gloriously, dramatically, heroically, unluckily, adjectly, humiliatingly, defiantly, haplessly. (NZ is particularly good at losing honorably, eg.) […] but it all adds up to the same common experience of sport: not winning. We repress the idea of losing. So much of the sporting experience is about anticipation: the sort of things we might do, when it all begins. And in anticipation, we are all champions, and the teams we follow and cheer for and cherish are always unbeatable until we are beaten. […] To say that winning in the only thing in sport is to say that Tabasco is the only thing in a Bloody Mary. The Tabasco gives you the zing and the bite, but it is not the Tabasco that intoxicates, and it is not the Tabasco that keeps you coming back for more.
Without defeat there is no victory, without losers, there is no winner. We celebrate the winners: and we do so while repressing the thought that every winner floats high on buoyancy on the tears of the losers. We should be grateful to every loser. Without losers there is no sport.
We who follow sport are hooked on the twists and turns of the narrative: the ever-changing cast of heroes and villains, the thrilling alternations of victory and defeat. It is the unexpected victory that is always the sweetest, because it came so close to defeat.
Arsenal was within a Thierry Henry miss of a wonderful win (Champions League final 2006). In 2005 Liverpool provided the miracle that Arsenal narrowly failed to deliver. Last summer England won the Ashes (seems a long time ago now), and the joy of the victory sprang from almost 20 years of unbroken defeat by Australia, and intermittent defeat by practically everybody else. Without that history of defeat, victory would have been far less sweet. Defeat is a constituent part of sporting joy.”
+++
"You can lose gloriously, dramatically, heroically, unluckily, adjectly, humiliatingly, defiantly, haplessly. (NZ is particularly good at losing honorably, eg.) […] but it all adds up to the same common experience of sport: not winning. We repress the idea of losing. So much of the sporting experience is about anticipation: the sort of things we might do, when it all begins. And in anticipation, we are all champions, and the teams we follow and cheer for and cherish are always unbeatable until we are beaten. […] To say that winning in the only thing in sport is to say that Tabasco is the only thing in a Bloody Mary. The Tabasco gives you the zing and the bite, but it is not the Tabasco that intoxicates, and it is not the Tabasco that keeps you coming back for more.
Without defeat there is no victory, without losers, there is no winner. We celebrate the winners: and we do so while repressing the thought that every winner floats high on buoyancy on the tears of the losers. We should be grateful to every loser. Without losers there is no sport.
We who follow sport are hooked on the twists and turns of the narrative: the ever-changing cast of heroes and villains, the thrilling alternations of victory and defeat. It is the unexpected victory that is always the sweetest, because it came so close to defeat.
Arsenal was within a Thierry Henry miss of a wonderful win (Champions League final 2006). In 2005 Liverpool provided the miracle that Arsenal narrowly failed to deliver. Last summer England won the Ashes (seems a long time ago now), and the joy of the victory sprang from almost 20 years of unbroken defeat by Australia, and intermittent defeat by practically everybody else. Without that history of defeat, victory would have been far less sweet. Defeat is a constituent part of sporting joy.”
Friday, February 02, 2007
Summer Sport..
I really have enjoyed the Australian Open. I know, its apples and oranges, chalk and cheese, but its hard to think of a sportsman, sportswomen, or a team as dominant as Roger Federer. Some of the shots that Federer made against Andy Roddick were unbelievable. I think Federer has now won four of the last five major tennis finals (losing the fifth to Raphel Nadeal). Simply stunning. But he is more than his record; Federer is a credit to the sport, both on and off the court.
I’ve been thinking a little bit about what I’ll call the romance of sport, which I think save the suburban grounds is slowly disappearing.
If you watch a lot of Rugby League, and Rugby Union you would have seen the Video Referee for some time.
If you spend a lot of summer in front of the cricket you would be quite familiar with the use of video replays to adjudicate run outs and stumpings. It think that there has been talk to extend this to include ‘LBWs’ and ‘catches’.
If you watched any of the Australian open, you will have noticed a little bit new technology on Rod Laver Arena. Players are able to use "Hawkeye" and challenge two calls in each set.
Sadly I think with each of these “technological developments” we lose the thing what I find to be special about sport, the unpredictability of human judgment. Well I think it is at least what I love about sport, and with the quest to make the calls perfect we are now able to look at everything, sped up, slowed down, from above, from in front, and from behind.
There’s something to be said for non-competitive sport, were players more often than not are playing because they love the game and perhaps “in the spirit”.
+++
Thinking about the spirit of the game, players who concede points, or who walk when they are out, or mention to the umpires if they did not catch a ball cleanly seem to be quite rare. It was saddening seeing both Craig McMillan (NZL v AUS), and Mike Hussey (AUS v ENG) remain in the middle, while seemingly knowing they were out. I like to seeing batsmen walk.
I am not too disappointed with how New Zealand has gone. They pushed Australia all the way in two of the three games: losing by 2 wickets (and but for a dropped catch, and messed up runout may well have won), and 8 runs (chasing 345). Given that England have just about wrapped up tonight's game, it looks like NZ will have to win one more game to qualify for the finals. We’ll see, irrespective of these two games, hopefully they can have a good World Cup.
I’ve been thinking a little bit about what I’ll call the romance of sport, which I think save the suburban grounds is slowly disappearing.
If you watch a lot of Rugby League, and Rugby Union you would have seen the Video Referee for some time.
If you spend a lot of summer in front of the cricket you would be quite familiar with the use of video replays to adjudicate run outs and stumpings. It think that there has been talk to extend this to include ‘LBWs’ and ‘catches’.
If you watched any of the Australian open, you will have noticed a little bit new technology on Rod Laver Arena. Players are able to use "Hawkeye" and challenge two calls in each set.
Sadly I think with each of these “technological developments” we lose the thing what I find to be special about sport, the unpredictability of human judgment. Well I think it is at least what I love about sport, and with the quest to make the calls perfect we are now able to look at everything, sped up, slowed down, from above, from in front, and from behind.
There’s something to be said for non-competitive sport, were players more often than not are playing because they love the game and perhaps “in the spirit”.
+++
Thinking about the spirit of the game, players who concede points, or who walk when they are out, or mention to the umpires if they did not catch a ball cleanly seem to be quite rare. It was saddening seeing both Craig McMillan (NZL v AUS), and Mike Hussey (AUS v ENG) remain in the middle, while seemingly knowing they were out. I like to seeing batsmen walk.
I am not too disappointed with how New Zealand has gone. They pushed Australia all the way in two of the three games: losing by 2 wickets (and but for a dropped catch, and messed up runout may well have won), and 8 runs (chasing 345). Given that England have just about wrapped up tonight's game, it looks like NZ will have to win one more game to qualify for the finals. We’ll see, irrespective of these two games, hopefully they can have a good World Cup.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)